The National Republican Senatorial Committee has drawn first blood in North Carolina’s pivotal Senate race, launching a devastating advertisement that exposes Roy Cooper’s nearly four-decade trail of progressive failures that left the Tar Heel State less safe, less prosperous, and less free.
The strategic offensive comes at a crucial moment when Republicans sense opportunity to flip a Senate seat by contrasting Cooper’s radical record with America First principles that actually deliver results for working families. Rather than allowing the outgoing governor to reinvent himself as a moderate, the NRSC is weaponizing Cooper’s own lengthy political career against him.
**Crime and Consequences**
The advertisement’s most powerful punch centers on Cooper’s soft-on-crime policies that contributed directly to violent crime across North Carolina. While progressive prosecutors nationwide have watched murder rates soar under their “reform” agenda, Cooper championed the same failed policies that prioritize criminal rights over victim safety.
This isn’t theoretical policy debate—it’s about real consequences for real families. When politicians like Cooper embrace progressive criminal justice ideology, law-abiding citizens pay the price in blood. The ad effectively connects Cooper’s policy choices to a brutal murder case, demonstrating how elite progressive theories translate into deadly street-level reality.
**Economic Warfare on Families**
Cooper’s tax-and-spend record provides Republicans with another devastating line of attack. While hardworking North Carolina families struggle with Biden-Harris inflation and economic uncertainty, Cooper consistently voted to increase their tax burden to fund bigger government programs.
This economic contrast strikes at the heart of America First economics: politicians should work to keep more money in families’ pockets, not extract wealth from productive citizens to feed bureaucratic expansion. Cooper’s record reveals a career politician more interested in growing government power than growing family prosperity.
**Parental Rights Under Siege**
Perhaps most damaging for Cooper’s suburban appeal is his support for biological males competing in women’s sports. This position represents the broader progressive assault on parental authority and common sense that has awakened millions of previously apolitical parents.
The transgender sports issue serves as a perfect proxy for the cultural divide between progressive elites who prioritize ideological purity over protecting children, and parents who simply want fairness and safety for their daughters. Cooper chose his side—and it wasn’t with North Carolina families.
**Hurricane Response Hypocrisy**
Cooper’s praise of the Biden-Harris administration’s botched hurricane response while simultaneously attacking President Trump reveals his true priorities: party loyalty over constituent welfare. When North Carolinians needed competent leadership during natural disaster recovery, Cooper provided political theater instead.
This contrast becomes even more stark when compared to Trump’s hands-on disaster response record, where the former president consistently delivered federal resources quickly and efficiently. Cooper’s partisan posturing during crisis moments exposes the hollow nature of his supposed moderation.
**Constitutional Stakes**
The North Carolina Senate race represents more than partisan politics—it’s about constitutional governance versus administrative state expansion. Cooper’s record consistently favors federal overreach and bureaucratic control over the federalism and individual liberty that made America exceptional.
Every vote Cooper cast for higher taxes and expanded government represents a step away from the constitutional framework our founders designed. His four-decade career embodies the progressive project of concentrating power in distant bureaucracies rather than empowering local communities and individual citizens.
**Strategic Assessment**
The NRSC’s early engagement reveals sophisticated political intelligence. By defining Cooper immediately using his own record, Republicans prevent the governor from running a personality-based campaign divorced from his actual governance failures.
Trump’s endorsement of Michael Whatley provides crucial grassroots energy and fundraising advantages, while Cooper must defend an increasingly unpopular progressive agenda in a state trending rightward. The timing suggests internal Republican polling shows significant vulnerability on crime, taxes, and cultural issues.
**Patriotic Path Forward**
This North Carolina battle could establish the template for defeating entrenched progressive politicians nationwide: relentlessly focus on their failed governance record rather than allowing them to campaign on empty promises of moderation.
Patriots should watch whether Cooper doubles down on progressivism or attempts unconvincing triangulation. Either way, his 37-year record speaks louder than campaign rhetoric—and it’s telling North Carolina voters exactly why America First leadership delivers better results than progressive ideology.
