The constitutional reckoning America has been waiting for is finally here. Senator Bill Hagerty’s renewed call for the impeachment of Judge James Boasberg isn’t just about holding one rogue jurist accountable—it’s about dismantling the weaponized judicial apparatus that has spent years undermining the will of American voters and the rule of law itself.
Boasberg’s record reads like a blueprint for judicial tyranny. As presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, he rubber-stamped the NSA’s warrantless surveillance programs in November 2020, even while acknowledging the “frequency and seriousness” of FBI errors that had already been exposed in the Russia investigation debacle. Think about that: a federal judge admitting the system was broken, then choosing to perpetuate it anyway.
But surveillance overreach was just the beginning. Boasberg’s most egregious constitutional violation came through his systematic obstruction of immigration enforcement during the Trump administration. This unelected judge had the audacity to threaten contempt charges against executive branch officials who were simply executing the lawfully enacted immigration policies that Americans voted for. Since when do federal judges get to override the constitutional authority of the executive branch to enforce our nation’s borders?
The answer, of course, is never—unless you’re part of the deep state resistance movement that spent four years trying to nullify the 2016 election through every institutional lever available.
Senator Hagerty isn’t alone in recognizing this threat to constitutional governance. Senators Ted Cruz and Eric Schmitt have joined the chorus, creating the kind of unified Republican pressure that gets results. This isn’t the scattered opposition of the past; this is coordinated constitutional conservatism with the institutional power to enforce consequences.
The evidence keeps mounting. Reports now suggest Boasberg authorized surveillance operations that captured Republican senators’ phone records—a revelation that should send chills down the spine of every American who believes in representative democracy. When judges start enabling spying operations against the very legislators who represent the people’s voice, we’ve crossed from judicial independence into judicial supremacy.
What makes this moment particularly significant is the broader context of institutional accountability that’s finally taking hold. For too long, conservative Americans watched as unelected bureaucrats and activist judges treated the Constitution like a suggestion rather than the supreme law of the land. The establishment’s response was always the same: “That’s just how the system works.” Well, the system wasn’t working for the American people, and patriots knew it.
Now we have the political alignment and institutional strength to do something about it. The House has the constitutional authority to impeach federal judges, and with growing Senate support, there’s real momentum behind holding Boasberg accountable for his overreach. This isn’t about partisan politics—it’s about restoring the proper balance of powers that the Founders designed to prevent exactly this kind of judicial tyranny.
The implications extend far beyond one judge. Success in impeaching Boasberg would establish crucial precedent that federal judges cannot weaponize their positions against constitutional governance without facing serious institutional consequences. It would signal to the entire federal judiciary that the era of unchecked activism is over, and that judicial independence doesn’t mean judicial supremacy.
For America First patriots, this represents validation of years of warnings about deep state overreach and judicial activism. The same voices that dismissed concerns about surveillance abuse and immigration obstruction as “conspiracy theories” now find themselves confronted with documented evidence of exactly what conservatives predicted would happen when institutional guardrails were abandoned.
The path forward is clear. House leadership must act on these impeachment calls, not just for symbolic purposes, but to restore constitutional balance and send an unmistakable message that American democracy belongs to the American people—not to unelected judges who think they can override the will of voters from their federal benches.
The constitutional restoration America voted for is finally within reach. It’s time to seize it.
